outset, specify some details. John Locke, father liberalism, considered the legitimate right of insurrection. Vested right and necessary when abuses of the government. When the government of the nation starves its citizens when it usurps the power or performs acts immoral and it is good to see the populace to rise up.
This fact leads us to some questions.
Can we say that the political world has changed since the eighteenth? Can we consider this notion of "popular uprising" is different from the time of Mirabeau? Is it as easy today to revolt against the powers that be? Not
I will.
Moreover, it is necessary to draw a distinction between rebellion and insurrection. The first term refers, as Hugo puts it, an uprising of a few against the majority. The second revolt of the multitude against a minority. A rebellion
always precedes the general insurrection, revolution.
Robespierre Before there was Danton. Danton before there was Camille Desmoulins. Still further? Jean-Sylvain Bailly.
Before the storming of the Bastille, there was the game of palms.
Rebellion is always the genesis of the insurgency. The "radicals" are always the precursors of political change. Thank you, Derriennic.
There.
Do not get me wrong. It is much more difficult to raise the masses today. And never compare Quebec 70s, with France in May 1968. Light years away from social pressures and various uprisings us apart.
The FLQ is it a rebellion or insurrection? It is certainly a rebellion. Point doubt about it.
He was also one of the disparate elements leading to the 1980 referendum.
At this point it is important to explain some details for those of you who do not trust that "Allo-Police". Also note that it is not prohibited from attending libraries to clean up your minds.
The FLQ was composed of dozens of independent cells. Anyone could claim such affiliation. No contact whatsoever between the members. No plan of action. That acronym.
Murder? Only Chenier. In fact, it is not even true.
No premeditation. Laporte was eating good chicken. He was himself killed by strangulation while trying to escape, while his tormentors were absent.
short, the Quebec Liberal Party is in error. I am not trying to "legitimize" actions of the FLQ, believe me. But it must admit that this movement has had a significant impact on subsequent events. It is also very misunderstood. Returning
. Who are the people who make up the PLQ? The
abandoned asphalt under Duplessis. Friends of Taschereau. Rich English. Francophones who blithely enjoyed the anglicized Quebec during the sixties and seventies. Members of Alliance Quebec. A lot of returns in Europe.
There are also undecided. People who vote as the "family". And, of course, under-educated. Where are the castles of the PLQ? Westmount. Pointe-Claire. Beaconsfield.
Think about it.
Jean Charest refused to apologize?
This shows just how far some politicians are disconnected from reality. Like what some people do just want a new "good" election.
Yes, it's wrong. Otherwise, we should quickly seal of obscurantism all major developments in the West. In the index, the France of 1789. In the index, the Magna Carta-.
Bravo, Liberal Party of Quebec!
0 comments:
Post a Comment